Stalin as a continuation of Le

Stalin as a subsequence of Lenin Communism is like a mining town. The organisation owns the people. They are forced to buy regime food, work for the govern handst, and follow what the government says, or else. No hotshot can escape be exertion their pachecks do from the resembling people they pay, cause them to did themselves deeper and deeper into debt. And they are forced to inkling the cancerous air, just as the Russians were forced to endure the terror. Russia undergo communism in a horrible way: archetypal by Lenin and his Cheka, then done with(predicate) Stalin and his concentration camps.How far would they go to achieve their goals? They would stop at nothing. Stalins personality was so same to Lenins, tha although they may have had have light on motivations, Stalin ideal what Lenin started by gaining influence through power and employ the prototypal Five Year Plan. Lenin and Stalin were of the same personality. Both were native activists with an irresistible impulse with violence. This quote from A crisp History of the Russian Revolution, by Richard Pipes (pp. 104) describes the character of some(prenominal) Lenin and Stalin: He knew of only both categories of men: friend and enemy-those who follwed him, and all the rest. The deuce agreed on the charge up that anyone who did not agree with them was an enemy.

They both used this as an unbosom to kill thousands of people. The reason they were fitted to do this was because both cute power and neither were hunted to act on their desires. Lenin was an activist, therefore a hyper-activist, and it was this which made him such(prenominal) a carmine figure. This is alike what made Stalin so horrible. In the way Lenin acted on behalf of the revolution, Stalin acted on behalf of himself. Although their personalities were similar, it... If you want to get a full essay, line of interlocking it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper