After reading the novel "Of Mice And Men", by John Steinbeck, do you think George Milton should be found guilty of the murder of Lennie Small?

Anyone would help their best friend if they needed some jack, notwithstanding what if they needed to be put to rest? George Milton is not conscience-smitten for the murder of his friend, Lennie Small, in the novel Of Mica and Men by John Steinbeck. George should be proven exonerated because of three reasons; Curley would reveal brutally murdered Lennie, George had to stop Lennie from unintentionally hurting others, and it was Georges obligation to end Lennies derogatory life. If George did not decimate Lennie in the painless way he did, then Curley would have murdered him in a pugnacious and belligerent way that was filled with indignation. On page 96, Curley retorted, Ill kill the big son-of-a-bitch myself. Ill shoot im in the guts. This interrelate shows that Curley was going out to murder Lennie. Also, it shows that George knew Curley was going to murder him painfully, so George knew he had to get it over with humanely. The second reason George is truthful is that if he did not do what he did, the number of Lennies inadvertent victims would continue to add up. On page nine, Lennie said, They was so little. Id address em, and pretty soon they bit my fingers and I pinched their heads a little and then they was dead---because they was so little.

In this quote you sop up that whenever the soft thing that Lennie had writhed, contorted, or cringed, he gloomy it. He has done it to mice, puppies, and women. So, George had to stop Lennie from doing these things, even if they were accidents. The most key evidence is that George is the only person who had a right to kill Le nnie, so it was not murder. On page 61, Can! dy stated, I ought to of rotating shaft that dog... If you want to get a full essay, dedicate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper